Well said, Mr Naavi. Understandable that the court showcases itself as a very tech savvy. But the question of evidence especially the 65B certification, whose possession the mobile was at that time, whether any big message or a document of loads of pages etc can be taken to have been ‘opened and read’ just because of the change of the colour in the double tick etc are all points of dispute and I am sure will be argued in the days to come.
Well said, Mr Naavi. Understandable that the court showcases itself as a very tech savvy. But the question of evidence especially the 65B certification, whose possession the mobile was at that time, whether any big message or a document of loads of pages etc can be taken to have been ‘opened and read’ just because of the change of the colour in the double tick etc are all points of dispute and I am sure will be argued in the days to come.