-
Naavi
-
IICA Qualified Independent Director
Book Cyber Crimes
-
Tag Archives: naavi
Magistrate D Arul Raj is an unsung hero in development of Jurisprudence under Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act
International Commission of Jurists, Bangalore had organized a lecture on Digital Evidence and Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act at the Karnataka High Court on 8th December 2017. Speaking on the occasion, Naavi highlighted the evolution of Section 65B as … Continue reading
Posted in Cyber Law
Tagged 65B, Arul Raj, basheer, ita 2000, naavi, Suhaskatti, vijayashankar
Leave a comment
10 Questions on Section 66A Judgement for which we seek answers
In the light of the momentous decision of the Supreme Court of India , striking down Section 66A of Information Technology Act 2000 as amended in 2008 (ITA 2008) in its judgement dated 24th march 2015 regarding the set of … Continue reading
“Judges Were Shocked” says Shreya Singhal..
Shreya Singhal, the 24 year old law student became a celebrity overnight because of the land mark judgement scrapping Section 66A of Information Technology Act 2000 as amended in 2008 (ITA 2008). Though the case was argued by luminaries such … Continue reading
Internet of Things (IoT) and threat of Section 66A judgement
The Government of India has released a policy document titled “IoT Policy Document” indicating that it foresees a market of USD 15 billion (approx Rs 90000 crores) by 2020. The connected decices are expected to increase from 200 million at … Continue reading
Was striking down of Section 66A Correct?
The decision of the Supreme Court of India [Writ Petition(criminal) No 167 of 2012] in scrapping Section 66A of Information Technology Act has received accolades from many. It is accepted that there is no debate as to whether Freedom of … Continue reading
Supreme Court on Section 79(3) and 69A of ITA 2008
In the din created by the striking down of Section 66A, the part of the judgement that related to Sections 79(3) and 69A have been submerged. Let’s now see what the judgement says about these two sections. Section 79 provides … Continue reading