Search Results for: cyber appellate tribunal

Airtel does a Maggi!

Posted on June 7, 2015 by Vijayashankar Na

Just as Maggi has got into a controversy on its taste enhancing additives to its noodles, Airtel appears to be encountering a controversy by introducing a “Computer contaminant” into its customer’s browsers which is an offence under Section 66 of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cyber Law | Leave a comment

Banks Prepare an assault on customers through Court actions

Posted on May 24, 2015 by Vijayashankar Na

Naavi.org has been highlighting the fact that banks are conducting “Unsafe Banking” in pursuance of “Profit before Customer Service” and pushing Customers into greater and greater risks. RBI has through the 2001 guidelines on Internet Banking and again through the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cyber Law | Leave a comment

17 years …The journey of naavi.org

Posted on May 12, 2015 by Vijayashankar Na

I am suddenly reminded by linked in that today naavi.org completed 17 years of existence. I was woken up to this reality by the congratulatory messages sent by some of my friends. 17 years has been a long time and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cyber Law | Leave a comment

“Judges Were Shocked” says Shreya Singhal..

Posted on April 3, 2015 by Vijayashankar Na

Shreya Singhal, the 24 year old law student became a celebrity overnight because of the land mark judgement scrapping Section 66A of Information Technology Act 2000 as amended in 2008 (ITA 2008). Though the case was argued by luminaries such … Continue reading →

Posted in Cyber Law | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Yet another Bank Fraud.. What will RBI say?

Posted on March 18, 2015 by Vijayashankar Na

Bank frauds have been so common in India that it hardly surprises any body when a new fraud is reported. The Banks are after technology in a hurry and RBI has either no clue to the risks or is just … Continue reading →

Posted in ITA 2008 | Leave a comment

Concurrent Civil and Criminal Cases

Posted on October 9, 2014 by Vijayashankar Na

Recently, I came across an article on the web discussing how a criminal conviction or trial proceedings can produce evidence for a civil compensation. (Related Article). This was regarding a proceeding in Canada. The points raised here appeared to be … Continue reading →

Posted in ITA 2008 | Leave a comment