Monthly Archives: August 2017

(This is in continuation of our discussion on Justice Chelmeshwar’s part of the judgement in the Privacy case) While the nine eminent judges went about their mission to declare “Privacy As a Fundamental Right”, they also encountered the problem defining … Continue reading →

The alacrity with which the honourable Supreme Court constituted a 9 member bench to review “Whether Privacy is a Fundamental Right” and the release of the voluminous judgement before the retirement of Chief Justice Mr Kehar indicates that the CJI … Continue reading →

[This is in continuation of our debate on the Privacy Judgement] The Puttaswamy judgement from the 9 member bench of the Supreme Court which was hailed as a “Historic” judgement ended up with a simple declaration that “Right to Privacy … Continue reading →

(This article is based on the copies of the Whistleblower’s letters which have now come to the public domain though they may be considered as not independently verified. In case there is any counter to the letter, we shall be … Continue reading →

In continuation of our previous article on the “Hashing of the Privacy Judgement” we can now look at the six pieces of individual judgement and the end notes in each of these judgement s that can be considered as “Judgmental … Continue reading →

The 9 Bench judgement of the Supreme Court on “Privacy as a Fundamental Right” following the petition of Justice K.S.Puttaswamy and Others, runs into 547 pages of discussion which makes a great material for law colleges as teaching material on … Continue reading →