Case on Bandwidth Theft booked under IPC
   
  
  
   
  
  In 
  an interesting case reported from Gurgaon, 
  it is alleged that one BPO namely PCLIT had illegally tapped into the lease 
  line of Amtek BPO causing a huge 
  bill to be raised on Amtek. The 
  company rightfully filed a complaint and the Police have registered a case 
  under Section 420 and Section 379 of IPC.
  We 
  may recall that it was the Gurgaon 
  Police who were once an object of criticism by a Company Acme
  Telepower that they did not 
  understand Cyber Crimes and hence 
  the company would shift its operations to Australia. In this case the Police 
  have used some common intelligence to check the illegal use of bandwidth by 
  PCLIT and proceeded to file a case. However, it may be noted that they have 
  recorded the primary offence under Section 379 for theft which applies for 
  "Theft of Movables". It is not clear why they ignored the booking of case 
  under ITA 2008 which was more appropriate.
  At 
  the same time, before jumping to conclusions, it is necessary for the 
  investigations to be continued to find out if the illegal tapping was a result 
  of a malicious attempt by PCLIT to wrongfully enrich itself or it was an 
  accidental cross switching of Cables either by the Company or the external 
  service providers.
  In the event the mistake was 
  that of the external cabling agency, then they would carry the vicarious 
  liability for the issue.
  
  While it is not difficult for the two neighboring
  BPOs to settle their dispute 
  regarding the bandwidth bill, both will now realise that the incident also 
  reflects a failure of the Information Security. It is now necessary for both 
  companies to establish that the cross switching did not result in compromise 
  of data of either companies with the other.
  God forbid if either of the 
  Companies work in the HIPAA space. Then this would be ca classical case of 
  "Data Breach"  by a business associate under the HITECH Act and the 
  consequences would be much larger than the bandwidth costs involved in the 
  dispute.
  This is an interesting case to 
  watch.
   
  
  
   
  
  NaaviMay 9, 2010
   
  
    
  
   
  
  
  Related Article: 
   
  
  
  
  
  Related Article in Techgoss
   
  
  
  
  
  Related Article on Acme Telepower
     
     
     
     Comments are Welcome at
      naavi@vsnl.com