The FAQ covers the following immediate questions to which more will be
added with the feedback received from the public.
Readers are requested to send their views as well as other questions so
that the FAQ can be expanded.
Naavi
April 27,2003
1. What are the Categories of Complaints that are covered by the
Adjudication Process?
The Adjudication process covers
contraventions of ITA-2000 under Chapter IX of ITA-2000. This covers
Section 43, 44 and 45of the Act.
If the AO is convinced that the
scope of the case extends to the offences listed under Chapter XI of the
Act, he shall transfer the case to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to
try the case.
Section 43 covers the following
types of contraventions.
Unauthorized-
(a) Access to a Computer,
Computer system or Computer network
(b) Downloading, copying or
extraction of data
(c) Introduction of a Computer
Contaminant or Virus
(d) Causing damage to any
Computer, Computer System or Computer Network, data, programmes
residing in a computer
(e) Causing disruption of
Computer, Computer System or Computer Network
(f) Causing Denial of Access
(g) Assisting another person to
facilitate access to a computer in contravention of the provisions
of the Act, rules or regulations made there under.
(h) causing the services
availed by a person to the account of another person
The word "Unauthorized" used above
may be taken to mean " Without the permission of the owner or any other
person who is in charge of a computer, computer system or computer
network.
The compensation under Section 43
can be for a maximum of Rs 1 crore.
Section 44 refers to penalty for
failure to furnish returns or documents or maintain proper account books
by the Certifying Authorities (CA). It does not apply to the public
except to the extent of information that a Digital Certificate holder
may be called upon to furnish by a CA.
Section 45 is a general provision
which can be applied to any contravention of the rules or regulations
made under the Act for which no specific penalty has been prescribed.
Penalties under this section are subject to a maximum of Rs 25,000/-
Top
2. To whom shall the
complaint be made?
The Complaint shall be made to
The Adjudicating Officer under
ITA-2000,
XYZ State/Union Territory, Secretary,
Department of Information Technology,
Government of XYZ State/Union Territory
XYZ City
The choice of the State or Union
territory is subject to the location of any of the Computers involved in
the offence being located in the particular State or Union Territory.
Top
3. What is the format
of the application?
Application may be made in plain
paper on a proforma available
here.
Top
4. What is the fee to be
paid? and How?
Rs 50 per application + 10 % of the
damages claimed, to be enclosed to the application in the form of a Bank
Draft payable at the respective city.
Top
5. What
are the consequences of a "Frivolous Complaint"?
AO can order making good of the
cost of the persons against whom a frivolous complaint has been made and
also a damage not exceeding Rs 25000/ as well as impose a fine not
exceeding RS 10000/-
Top
6.What are the evidences to be presented while filing a complaint?
Evidence in the form of documents
either in electronic form or otherwise indicating the commission of a
contravention, the time and place of its occurrence and prima-facie
indicating the respondent's involvement.
Though not specified, it is
presumed that witnesses can be produced during the enquiry. It is also
presumed that the evidence produced should generally satisfy the
standards acceptable under the Indian Evidence Act though the AO can
adopt his own procedures in this regard.
he AO can call for an investigation
if required from the local DSP or CERT-IND or an officer of the
Controller of Certifying Authorities and collect evidences of his own.
Top
7. How long
does the Adjudication process may take?
As far as possible, the AO is
expected to hear and decide the case within 4 months and complete the
whole matter in 6 months.
Top
8. What kind of
compensation can one expect?
While adjudging the claim, the AO
will take into account the amount of unfair advantage wherever
quantifiable enjoyed as a result of default, the amount of loss caused
to any person as a result of the default, and the repetitive nature of
the default, subject to the limits prescribed in the Act.
Top
9. What if the order
is not satisfactory?
An appeal can be preferred to the
CRAT (Cyber Regulations Appellate Tribunal) along with the copy of the
order.
Top
10.Is
it necessary to physically be present for enquiry?
The AO is likely to make available
infrastructure for promoting on-line settlement of enquiry or disputes
or for taking evidence.
Subject to this provision, at
present it may be considered that the AO may at his discretion insist on
the personal presence of the complainant and/or the respondent in the
notice that would be served for the purpose.
Top
11. What
if the complainant does not know the suspect?
The procedure in respect of
unidentified defaulter is not yet clear. It is presumed that the
complainant would provide as much of an identity as feasible at the time
of enquiry and the AO would order investigation if he deems it fit.
In practice however, if the stakes
are high, the complainant should conduct his own investigation and
produce as much of evidence as possible to identify the respondent and
the act of default.
Top
12. Can a complainant be represented by a consultant during the enquiry?
While the procedure is not clear in
this regard, it is presumed that a representation would be allowed on
request.
Top
P.S: The FAQ list will be
expanded and corrected if required as more information becomes
available. I request the readers to contribute with what ever
information is at their disposal in this regard.