. | The passage of the ITA-2000 and the zealousness with which the Pune Court has acted against Rediff.com on an alleged action involving distribution of obscene material, has opened a question mark on whether Indians elsewhere in the world can be punished for offenses under Sec 67 of the ITA-2000 even though such an activity may not be a crime in the country in which they are living. According to Sec 67 of the ITA Act "Publishing", "Transmitting" or
"Causing to publish" in electronic form any obscene material is a punishable
offense. The penalty is stiff with a possibility of imprisonment upto 5
years even for the first offense.
Sec 67 Publishing of information which is obscene in electronic form
According to Sec 1(2), the Act extends to "the whole of India and, save as otherwise provided in this Act, it applies also to any offense or contravention thereunder committed outside India by any person"
75 Act to apply for offense or contravention committed outside India In view of Sec 81 which states
and Sec 61 which states
the provisions of the ITA-2000 becomes applicable to both Citizens of India
and others whether they are living in India or not.
If therefore an offense is committed under the Act and the person is under some control of the Indian Government such as having a passport issued in India, it is likely that the person may be brought to book even though the "Offense" committed may not be an "Offense" under the law of a foreign country where the Indian citizen may be residing. Under section 75, the applicability is conditional to " the act or conduct constituting the offense or contravention involving a computer, computer system or computer network located in India". This provision is more appropriate to describe a "Hacking" offense. However, in the context of "Causing transmission" of an obscene material, any act including "Providing access to the Internet" may be construed as "Using a computer network in India". It can therefore be surmised that "No Indian Passport holder should dare to contravene the ITA-2000" since he runs the risk of being extradited and imprisoned. Does this restrict an Indian from maintaining an objectionable site outside India?.. Practically Yes, unless the site owner has taken reasonable steps to block Indian visitors from visiting the site. If so what would be a reasonable step? Blocking the IP addresses of Indian ISPs? Or should it be a request to the Indian Government to block access to the site from Indian ISP s? Will a notice "This site is not meant to be viewed by Indians. The management of the site is not responsible for any Indian viewing the site..etc' The situation here is similar to the French case against Yahoo- Nazi
Memorabilia site. The larger issue is "Whether the Indian National Government
can impose itself on the Cyber activities of a person (Indian or Non Indian)?"
not within the geographical jurisdiction of India? And Is it practicable
to extend the jurisdiction of the Non Cyber Society to the Cyber Society
across borders?
Naavi
|
. |